MEDI6216 Genomic Medicine Dissertation
The dissertation can be by research or a professional project. The dissertation by research is a hypothesis-driven small-scale empirical research project involving quantitative or qualitative research methods. A dissertation by professional project can take a variety of forms, including: a critical appraisal of research literature relevant to a particular area of practice, systematic review, service audit, service development, service delivery needs assessment, service evaluation or clinical case review
Aims and Objectives
For students to build on their previous knowledge, skills and experience by undertaking a medical genomics research project that shows originality in the application of knowledge, together with a practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in a specialism of healthcare science. You have two options: Dissertation by Research: This will be a hypothesis driven research project that entails small-scale empirical research normally involving quantitative research methods. Research involving human participants requires the appropriate governance process and follows the NIHR Coordinated Systems for gaining NHS permissions. Dissertation by Professional Project: This can take a variety of forms, including: Service audit Evaluation of a service development Systematic review Service delivery needs assessment Service evaluation Clinical case review This module aims to: Use specific research or a professional project to show how the principles covered in the MSc Genomic Medicine programme of study link together and demonstrate a coherent understanding of the issues relating to the field of Genomic Medicine. In particular: • To develop your skills in the organisation, analysis and presentation of a scientific report of an original piece of work. • To experience the practice of doing research as a process leading to personal and professional development, growth, and learning.
Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:
- Justify the rationale for research governance and ethical frameworks when undertaking research or innovation in the NHS
- Identify a research question and critically evaluate the novelty and importance of the research question
- Design, plan and undertake a research project to test a hypothesis from conception to completion/archiving in accordance with ethical and research governance regulations drawing on expert advice where necessary and involving patients and service users
- Analyse data using appropriate methods and statistical techniques, and interpret, critically discuss and draw conclusions from the data
- Prepare a written report that describes and critically evaluates the research undertaken, clearly identifying the strengths and weaknesses
- Prepare and present a summary of the project to specialist, non-specialist OR lay audiences
• Protocol development • Project planning: asking the right research question • Research Process: designing a project • Research governance and ethical processes • Analysis • Critical appreciation and interpretation • Report writing • Presentation skills • Working under supervision • Time management
This module allows you to develop and undertake a research project with experts in the field.
Learning and Teaching
Teaching and learning methods
Individual research supervision both face-to-face and electronically, and access to the Faculty of Medicine’s staff and resources. A primary supervisor and a member of University staff supervise each student on a one-to-one basis. Students are given access to our BlackBoard website that provides comprehensive detail about all stages of the dissertation
|Total study time||600|
Resources & Reading list
Bowling, A. (2009). Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services.
Bowling, A. (2005). Handbook Of Health Research Methods: Investigation, Measurement And Analysis.
The assessment for the module provides you with the opportunity to demonstrate achievement of the learning outcomes. There will be five components to the assessment i) Project proposal, ii) Half-way report, iii) Synopsis, iv) Final written report v) Poster presentation. The pass mark for the module and all assessed components is 50%. You must pass the final written report to pass the module. If you do not achieve the pass mark on this module by achieving 50% or more in all components, you may still pass by compensation. To do this, you must achieve a qualifying mark of 40% in the project proposal, and poster presentation. Each of the component marks is then combined, using the appropriate weighting, to give an overall mark for the module. If this overall mark is greater than or equal to 50% you will have passed the module. If your overall mark is less than 50% when the weighting has been applied to the components, you will have failed the module. If you have not achieved 40% or more on all components, you cannot use compensation and have failed the module. If you have failed the module, you will have the opportunity to submit work at the next referral (re-sit) opportunity using the method outlined below. You must achieve the pass mark in all referred components. On passing your referrals, your final module mark will be capped at 50%.
Half way report
|Poster Presentation (1000 words)||10%|
|Project proposal (2000 words)||20%|
|Written report (6000 words)||70%|
|Written report (6000 words)||100%|
Repeat type: Internal