> I am curious about the statistics concerning the number of e-prints relative
> to the journal literature. Harnad repeatedly mentions that LANL archive
> contains 40% of the journal literature at present and compares it to 20% of
> the math archive.
Here's one way to estimate it for the physics arXiv: percentage of
current citations by papers in within arXiv not papers not within
arXiv (courtesy of Les Carr, Zhuoan Jiao, Tim Brody & Ian Hickmen):
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/Tim/sld003.htm
There are other ways to estimate it too. See:
http://opcit.eprints.org/ijh198/
http://opcit.eprints.org/tdb198/opcit/
For an estimate of what percentage of the current maths literature is
in the maths arXiv, I will let Greg Kuperberg reply.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stevan Harnad harnad_at_cogsci.soton.ac.uk
Professor of Cognitive Science harnad_at_princeton.edu
Department of Electronics and phone: +44 23-80 592-582
Computer Science fax: +44 23-80 592-865
University of Southampton
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/
Highfield, Southampton
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM
NOTE: A complete archive of the ongoing discussion of providing free
access to the refereed journal literature online is available at the
American Scientist September Forum (98 & 99 & 00):
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html
You may join the list at the site above.
Discussion can be posted to:
american-scientist-open-access-forum_at_amsci.org
Received on Mon Jan 24 2000 - 19:17:43 GMT