Re: New channel of support for open-access publishing

From: David Goodman <David.Goodman_at_LIU.EDU>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:24:28 -0500

The charge can be broken down into a
submission fee (for all articles) and a publication fee (for those
articles published.) The submission fee covers the cost of peer review;
the publication fee covers the cost of copy-editing and distribution.

Dr. David Goodman
Associate Professor,
Palmer School of Library and Information Science
Long Island University, Brookville, NY
dgoodman_at_liu.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Grimwade [mailto:AGRIMWADE_at_The-Scientist.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:34 PM
To: AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM_at_LISTSERVER.SIGMAXI.ORG
Subject: Re: New channel of support for open-access publishing

Journals with 90% rejection rates, like Nature, Science and Cell have
considerably higher editorial costs (per published paper) than those
with
rejection rates of 40%-60%, which is an average value for
middle-of-the-road
biomedical journals. Nearly the same effort goes into peer reviewing a
rejected paper as an accepted paper.

As PLoS charges only those authors whose papers are published, and as
they
aspire to Nature-like selectivity, their editorial costs will be higher
than
"average" open-access journals. You might even call their $1,500 a
bargain.

----------------------------
Alexander M. Grimwade Ph. D.
Publisher
THE SCIENTIST
3535 Market Street, Suite 200
Philadelphia PA 19104-3385

Phone: (215) 386 9601 x3020
Fax: (215) 387 7542
Email: agrimwade_at_the-scientist.com
Web Site: http://www.the-scientist.com
Received on Fri Jan 16 2004 - 18:24:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:47:18 GMT