Re: Apercus of WOS Meeting: Making Ends Meet in the Creative Commons

From: Stevan Harnad <harnad_at_ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 22:28:02 +0000

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, [identity deleted] wrote:

> Do you know about/have a view on this?
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>
> Does anyone have any involvement with Science Commons? - they are
> exploring the idea of extending Creative Commons idea of flexible
> copyright to scientific work:
> http://creativecommons.org/
> http://science.creativecommons.org/

A CC license is definitely always preferable, if/when it can be
successfully negotiated; but it is equally definitely *not* a prerequisite
for OA, and should not be described as such (particularly with 92%
of journals already green on self-archiving!). To hold out needlessly
for CC is simply to put another needless retardant on 100% OA, which is
already long, long overdue.

Please see:

    Re: "Free Access vs. Open Access"
              On the Deep Disanalogy
              Between Text and Software and
              Between Text and Data
              Insofar as Free/Open Access is Concerned
    http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2967.html

and

    "Apercus of WOS Meeting: Making Ends Meet in the Creative Commons"
    http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3797.html

    Re: "Evolving Publisher Copyright Policies On Self-Archiving"
    http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/4128.html

    Re: "Green, Gold, Elsevier, Springer"
    http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/4005.html

        "The Creative Commons License is of course desirable and welcome,
        if and when it can be successfully agreed between author and
        publisher. But it definitely is not a necessary condition for
        self-archiving, and to imply that it is, and to abstain from
        self-archiving until/unless a CC License is successfully agreed
        is unnecessary, irrational, and would only serve to further
        delay the 100% OA that is already fully within reach."

Stevan Harnad

AMERICAN SCIENTIST OPEN ACCESS FORUM:
A complete Hypermail archive of the ongoing discussion of providing
open access to the peer-reviewed research literature online (1998-2004)
is available at:
    http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/index.html
        To join or leave the Forum or change your subscription address:
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html
        Post discussion to:
    american-scientist-open-access-forum_at_amsci.org

UNIVERSITIES: If you have adopted or plan to adopt an institutional
policy of providing Open Access to your own research article output,
please describe your policy at:
        http://www.eprints.org/signup/sign.php

UNIFIED DUAL OPEN-ACCESS-PROVISION POLICY:
    BOAI-2 ("gold"): Publish your article in a suitable open-access
            journal whenever one exists.
            http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#journals
    BOAI-1 ("green"): Otherwise, publish your article in a suitable
            toll-access journal and also self-archive it.
            http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/
    http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml
Received on Thu Nov 25 2004 - 22:28:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:47:42 GMT