(wrong string) £ 1.5bn a year

From: Peter Suber <peters_at_EARLHAM.EDU>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:41:58 -0400

At 07:37 PM 9/27/2005, Peter Banks wrote:
      [...]
      Although Peter Suber recently claimed (in a
      letter to the Washington Times) that "Study after study has
      shown that
      free online access increases the impact of research
      literature, as
      measured by citations, 50 percent to 250 percent," I am not
      sure what
      "study after study" refers to, though is clearly is a
      reference to
      Harnad's work. 

      Dr. Harnad has provided one other refererence
      <
      http://www.crsc.uqam.ca/lab/chawki/graphes/EtudeImpact.htm>,
      so perhaps
      "study after study" means literally that: two studies. Or
      maybe there are
      more, but I can't find references.



I was referring to the many studies collected by Steve Hitchcock in his
excellent bibliography:

The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a
bibliography of studies
http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html

     Peter



________________________________________________________________________________
Peter Suber
Open Access Project Director, Public Knowledge
Research Professor of Philosophy, Earlham College
Author, SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Editor, Open Access News blog
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/
peter.suber_at_earlham.edu
Received on Wed Sep 28 2005 - 20:33:07 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:48:02 GMT