Deceits and conceits

Deceptions for selfish gain are ubiquitous amongst animals1, plants2 and fungi, in morphologies or behaviours that lure prey or attract services, or distract predators or competitors, or provide camouflage for ambush or protection. Human hunters traditionally use deception to trap and snare game, with likely origins in the earliest uses of fibre cord some 50,000 years ago3.

Within this historical context, deceptions will have always played a fundamental role in the theatre of war. Records of the 1274 BCE Battle of Kadesh between the Egyptian and Hittite empires describe a devastating use of misdirection. The first military treatise – Sun Tzu’s The Art of War from 5ᵗʰ century BCE China – sets deception as an axiom of war. Deception can also have peaceful intent, for playful simulation4, seduction5 or dramatisation6.

Whereas deception achieves an honourable objective in outwitting another or deflecting their attention, deceitful behaviour has more treacherous purpose. Here is Achilles, the finest warrior in Homer’s 7ᵗʰ century BCE Iliad7, furiously rejecting a peace offering from Agamemnon, his commander-in-chief, who had publicly dishonoured him:

“As for me, hound that he is, he dares not look me in the face. I will take no counsel with him, and will undertake nothing in common with him. He has wronged me and deceived me enough, he shall not cozen me further; let him go his own way, for Jove has robbed him of his reason. I loathe his presents, and for himself care not one straw …”

Deceitful actions have fashioned the human condition throughout history, as imitations8, impersonations9, dishonesties10, token gestures11, empty pledges12 and downright lies13. We might in time expose as hollow, or embed as integral, the best mimicked emotions14 and the most earnest intents15. Does recognising others’ deceits provoke denunciation, as for Achilles, or will it instead elicit emulation16?

‘Comparisons are odious’ as we like to proclaim about subjective matters17, ever since the English monk John Lydgate brought to a close his 1440 debate between a horse, a goose and a sheep18:

Odyous of olde ben alle comparisons

And of comparisons engendrid is hatered

And alle folke be not lyke of condicions

Nor lyke disposed of thought wyll and dede

Comparisons fuel conceit – the image we have of ourself. Recorded history, being largely framed by the ruling classes, abounds with conceits of the vain and arrogant, in flaunting privilege19, feeling pride20 and envy21, purposeful appropriation22, and double standards in conduct23, values24 and principles25. Conceits define character. Here is Tolstoy’s Anna Pavlovna, confidant of Empress Maria Fiodorovna at the Russian court, greeting the ever-urbane Prince Vasili to her soirĂ©e, as Napoleon Bonaparte’s forces were gathering against the Russo-Austrian army26:

Eh bien, mon prince, so Genoa and Lucca are now no more than private estates of the Bonaparte family. No, I warn you – if you are not telling me that this means war, if you again allow yourself to condone all the infamies and atrocities perpetrated by that Antichrist (upon my word I believe he is Antichrist), I don’t know you in future. You will no longer be a friend of mine, or my ‘faithful slave’, as you call yourself! But how do you do, how do you do? I see that I am scaring you. Sit down and talk to me.”


___________________________________

Milestones in evolution and history


C.P. Doncaster, Timeline of the Human Condition, star index