Re: The preprint is the postprint

From: Greg Kuperberg <greg_at_MATH.UCDAVIS.EDU>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:40:03 -0800

On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 04:38:02PM +0000, Stevan Harnad wrote:
> I don't know what point you are making, David. The proposition was that
> the non-peer-reviewed preprint is the same as the peer-reviewed
> postprint, i.e., that peer-review is either non-existent or
> unnecessary.

I have never said, nor do I believe, that peer review is either
non-existent or unnecessary. I believe that the preprint is the postprint
in the same sense that "Greg Kuperberg with tenure" is the same person as
"Greg Kuperberg without tenure".
  /\  Greg Kuperberg (UC Davis)
 /  \
 \  / Visit the Math ArXiv Front at
  \/  * All the math that's fit to e-print *
Received on Mon Jan 24 2000 - 19:17:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:45:58 GMT