Re: UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) review

From: Stevan Harnad <>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:46:28 +0000

This is a response to the HEFCE "invitation to contribute" recommendations
for restructuring the RAE

I have written two papers on how the RAE might be greatly improved in
its assessment accuracy and at the same time made far less effortful
and costly -- while (mirabile dictu) doing a great indirect service
to research and researchers, both in the UK and in the rest of the
scholarly/scientific world as well:

    Harnad, S. (2001) "Research access, impact and assessment." Times Higher
    Education Supplement 1487: p. 16.

    Harnad, S. (2001) The Self-Archiving Initiative. Nature 410: 1024-1025

If you wish to see what the RAE would look like if UK research output
were continually accessible online, and hence continuously assessable, see:

To see how the RAE could help hasten this outcome (which is in any case
optimal and inevitable), see:

We at Southampton are currently harvesting the RAE submissions data
and putting them in an Eprint Archive to provide a "demo" of the sorts of
possibilities an online, open-access research corpus opens up for
research visibility, accessibility, uptake, usage, citation, impact and

Stevan Harnad
Received on Mon Oct 28 2002 - 20:46:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:46:40 GMT