Re: Open Letter to Philip Campbell, Editor, Nature

From: Mark Doyle <doyle_at_APS.ORG>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:47:06 -0500


On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 08:22 AM, Stevan Harnad wrote:

> Many thanks to Michael Eisen for citing the source for his prior
> posting about a question of interpretation in the new Nature Licensing
> Agreement. The question is about one ambiguous sentence -- not in the
> Nature License itself, or the official Nature FAQ about it, but in a
> promotional Nature news-item that was written about it. I am rather
> confident -- though I am fully prepared to admit it publicly if I prove
> to be wrong -- that my (charitable) interpretation of this sentence is
> the correct one.

Just wondering Stevan if you ever got a response from Nature to your
open letter. I don't want to open the whole thing up for debate again,
but I am curious if this was ever clarified by Nature to your


Mark Doyle
Manager, Product Development
The American Physical Society
Received on Thu Feb 27 2003 - 16:47:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:46:52 GMT