On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, DECLAN BUTLER, NATURE wrote:
> Its strongest recommendation is that the UK government should ensure that
> funders make it compulsory for researchers to post their papers online.
> "Our idea - a rabbit out of the hat - will make the university library
> system sit up and listen," says Gibson.
>
> The idea of posting material online has been around for a decade, and an
> increasing number of institutions are building online repositories.
> DSpace, for example, developed at the Massachusetts Institute of
> Technology, aims to store the institute's entire intellectual output,
> including data and course materials (see Nature 420, 17-18; 2002).
MIT/HP's DSpace, with a good deal of dosh in subsidy, is predicatably
getting most of the mentions, but it is Southampton's GNU EPrints that is
getting most of the archives:
http://archives.eprints.org/index.php?action=browse#version
* GNU EPrints v2 (113)
* other (45)
* DSpace (28)
* GNU EPrints v1 (18)
* ARNO (2)
* DiVA (1)
* CDSWare (1)
and, more important, providing the guidance and policy on how and why
and with what to fill the archives:
http://software.eprints.org/handbook/
http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/
http://archives.eprints.org/index.php?page=all
Not that it's the software that matters:
"EPrints, DSpace or ESpace?"
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2670.html
What it will all come down to is institutional self-archiving
policies. Once those policies are mandated, the OA era will be upon us.
http://www.eprints.org/signup/sign.php
It is quite true that the idea of self-archiving has been around for a decade:
http://www.arl.org/sc/subversive/ (1994)
It is historians who will have to explain why it took us so long to get down to
implementing it:
http://cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00001699/00/nature.html (1998)
http://cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00001685/00/12harnad.html (1999)
http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/harnad.html (2001)
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/resolution.htm (2001)
> Gibson says he hopes the report will make researchers aware of the issue.
> "The sad thing is that academics don't really care as long as they get
> their work published," notes Gibson. According to a recent survey by the
> Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research at City
> University London, 82% of working scientists say they know little or
> nothing about open access.
That is why Ian Gibson's committee was wise to recommend the mandating
of self-archiving. Now all that is needed is for institutions to implement
that mandate. (And they will!)
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/UKSTC.htm
http://www.eprints.org/signup/fulllist.php
Stevan Harnad
UNIVERSITIES: If you have adopted or plan to adopt an institutional
policy of providing Open Access to your own research article output,
please describe your policy at:
http://www.eprints.org/signup/sign.php
UNIFIED DUAL OPEN-ACCESS-PROVISION POLICY:
BOAI-2 ("gold"): Publish your article in a suitable open-access
journal whenever one exists.
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#journals
BOAI-1 ("green"): Otherwise, publish your article in a suitable
toll-access journal and also self-archive it.
http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/
http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml
AMERICAN SCIENTIST OPEN ACCESSS FORUM:
A complete Hypermail archive of the ongoing discussion of providing
open access to the peer-reviewed research literature online (1998-2004)
is available at:
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/index.html
To join the Forum:
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html
Post discussion to:
american-scientist-open-access-forum_at_amsci.org
Received on Fri Jul 23 2004 - 22:58:33 BST