Re-posted from Peter Suber's Open Access News
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html
Mandated OA for publicly-funded medical research in the US
Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) introduced a bill into the U.S. Senate
yesterday that would mandate OA to publicly-funded medical research
within four months of its publication. Officially titled the American
Center for Cures Act of 2005, the bill is informally known as the
CURES Act. It would create a new agency within the NIH, the American
Center for Cures (ACC), whose primary mission would be to translate
fundamental research into therapies. The bill is very large and covers
a lot of territory, but for our purposes the critical part is Section
499H. Like the existing NIH policy, the CURES Act would apply only
to the author's final peer-reviewed manuscript, although copyright
holders would have the option to replace it with the final published
text. Public access would be provided by PubMed Central. The bill
goes beyond the NIH policy in several important ways. It requires
free online access and does not merely request it. It shortens the
permissible delay to four months. It extends the OA policy beyond
the NIH to research funded by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Agency for Healthcare Research. Finally, it
explicitly says that non-compliance may be a ground for the funding
agency to refuse future funding. The bill is co-sponsored by Thad
Cochran (R-MS).
See the summary of the bill (discussing all its important provisions
except the OA mandate), the section-by-section breakdown (the OA
mandate is in Section 499H), and some quotations from supporters.
http://lieberman.senate.gov/documents/bills/051207curesbill.pdf
http://lieberman.senate.gov/documents/bills/051207curessectionbysection.pdf
http://lieberman.senate.gov/documents/bills/051207curesquotes.pdf
(PS: This is a major step. It would effectively mandate OA to
all medical research funded by the Department of Health and Human
Services, making it more effective and wider in scope than the NIH
public-access policy. More later, I promise.)
http://publicaccess.nih.gov/
Update. First a correction. The bill was introduced December 7,
not December 8. Now some more links:
* Press release from Senator Lieberman's office
http://lieberman.senate.gov/newsroom/release.cfm?id=249566
* Press release from the Alliance for Taxpayer Access.
https://mx2.arl.org/Lists/SPARC-OAForum/Message/2600.html
Excerpt:
http://www.taxpayeraccess.org/
'The Cures Bill is exactly the medicine that's needed,' said
Heather Joseph, Executive Director of SPARC (the Scholarly
Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition) and a leader of
the ATA. 'It goes right to the heart of the case for unfettered
access to publicly funded research. Senators Lieberman and
Cochran took a close look at how best to speed development
of treatments for diseases. Among their conclusions is that
it's time we ensure the research we're already conducting is
available to all potential users.' Pat Furlong, executive
director of Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy and an ATA
member, was also pleased with the bill. 'It recognizes how
important the sharing of information is to speeding research
and translating new knowledge into cures,' said Furlong. 'In
the age of the Internet, it makes no sense for the results of
taxpayer-funded research to be hidden away.'
Posted by Peter Suber:
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2005_12_04_fosblogarchive.html#113413512422857244
Received on Fri Dec 09 2005 - 17:32:36 GMT