Re: How to Compare IRs and CRs

From: Thomas Krichel <krichel_at_OPENLIB.ORG>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:09:32 +0600

  Arthur Sale writes

> In response to Tom's request for one university that will guarantee that
> they collect all their research output, here are two:
>
> Queensland Institute of Technology, Australia, since 2004. University
> mandate since 2004. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/ Now in its 5th year!

  The site can not be reached on Februrary 17 at 09:41:21 NOVT 2008.
  http://qut.edu.au can be, but I don't find such a statement there.

> University of Queensland, Australia, since beginning of 2008.

  That is for just 1 and a half months?

> Now achieving annual government research reporting through their
> IR. This implies 100% coverage of
> course. http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/

  I did not ask you to tell me about them, I asked if there would
  be an official from an institutions warrant us that they have
  achieved it. I happen to know a bit about the Queensland Institute
  of Technology, situation, I hold a QUT staff card and know the
  repository manager there. But I don't think that it is worth
  discussing the situation in one particular institution here.

  I am not saying that IRs are not a potentially good development
  and I am not saying that they will never work. But I hope that
  we can agree that, from today's perspective, filling IRs
  until we achieve 100% open access will be a very very long
  process.

  With cheers from Novosibirsk (sunny, -13C),


  Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
  phone: +7 383 330 6813 skype: thomaskrichel
Received on Sun Feb 17 2008 - 04:20:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:49:13 GMT