(wrong string) ège]

From: (wrong string) élène.Bosc <hbosc-tchersky_at_orange.fr>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:30:06 +0100

In the 80, when we used several different biological, biomedical and
chemical databases at the same time, for our bibliographic researches (via
Dialog for example) we had a lot of doubles in the results but this problem
has been finally solved : no doubt that researches in repositories will be
improved on the same way .....as soon as repositories are filled up.
Hélène Bosc

From: "Chanier Thierry" <thierry.chanier_at_UNIV-FCOMTE.FR>
To: <AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM_at_LISTSERVER.SIGMAXI.ORG>
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Repositories: Institutional or Central ? [in French, from
Rector's blog, U. Liège]
[...]Now I give to colleagues the OAISTER URL (with the path to follow) to
get
all my publications (because some of them are in other archives).
The problem is : deposits in Edutice appear twice in the OAISTER list (as
deposits of Edutice and of HAL - but there is one only deposit).
It is a concrete exemple of progress which should be made to avoid
repetitions in harvesters (among many other new features).
Received on Thu Feb 05 2009 - 22:02:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:49:39 GMT