Re: Post-print Confusion. Can you Help?

From: Stevan Harnad <harnad_at_ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:00:56 -0500

A preprint is an unrefereed draft. A postprint is a peer-reviewed,
revised, accepted draft, anything from the authorès final accepted
draft to the publisher's PDF:
http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/self-faq/#What-is-Eprint

Not only is it not necessary to deposit the publisher's PDF, it is not
even useful; there are far more publisher restrictions and embargoes on
the publisher's PDF than on the author's final draft:
http://bit.ly/8LTuhw
http://romeo.eprints.org/stats.php

What all the major mandates require authors to deposit is the author's
peer-reviewed, revised, accepted draft, not the publisher's proprietary
version.
http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/

Stevan Harnad


On 10-01-12, at 09:43, Ashley Cousins wrote:

> We have recently begun requesting that scientists at the Institute of
> Cancer
> Research (ICR) send us their pre-prints and post-prints for inclusion
> in the
> ICR repository. Some scientists have since been in contact to say
> that most
> publishers they deal with do not provide post-prints. Either they
> just send
> the published version or they send a notification when the article has
> been
> published. I thought at first that the scientists may be confused and
> that
> the documents they took for published versions were in fact
> post-prints.
> However, when I put this to them they were quite adamant that the
> documents
> were published versions.
>
> If this is true, this creates a big problem for us. Scientists are
> very
> reluctant to submit pre-prints as these may contain serious factual
> inaccuracies and so if we don't receive post-prints this will
> dramatically
> reduce the number of documents we can include in the Repository.
>
> Are our scientists correct: are there publishers who don't send
> post-prints?
> If so, is there any way of encouraging them to send post-prints and
> will
> they charge us for this?
>
> Any information anyone could provide on this subject would be
> gratefully
> received.
>
> Ashley Cousins
> Institute of Cancer Research Library
Received on Tue Jan 12 2010 - 20:02:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:50:01 GMT