> From:          "Valenti Gianni" <GV195@psy.soton.ac.uk>
> Date:          Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:46:54 GMT
>
> Is it a soul that differentiates us from machines?
> What is a soul?
> Does it exist or is simply used as an excuse just like the 
> subconcious?
> Do machines have a soul?
> How do we know ?
> Is it the ability to feel pain?
> Do the machines feel pain?
You have many questions here!
There are two 'camps' in the soul debate.  The physicalists, who 
believe that the 'soul' as such, is a by-product of consciousness or 
self awareness.  Physicalists believe that when you die, there is no 
soul, because the 'soul' is a product of the biology of the brain and 
therefore dies with you.
Dualists, on the other hand, believe that the soul is a detachable 
part. Basically, these souls float around, and attatch themselves to 
a child (or whatever) when he/she is born.  When the individual dies, 
the soul detaches itself and floats off again andthe cycle continues.
Hence, in order to ask whether a machine has a soul, we have to first 
address the definition of a soul:  do you believe a soul is just the 
by-product of our biology and self-awareness?  Is it something 
spiritual and immortal?  Is a soul a reflection of our unique 
personality?
The concept of a soul is very human  - we attribute ourselves as 
having a soul due to our position as 'higher beings'.  It is also a 
way of accepting our earthly mortality - the belief that we go on 
beyond our feeble bodies and never truely die.
If you are a dualist, then you may never accept that machines
will have a 'soul'.  However, if you believe it is a product of 
intelligence and self awareness, you may ask, does a self -aware 
machine have a soul?
As for 'Can machines feel pain' - that is something else entirely.  
Let me ask you - How do you KNOW that I feel pain?  Does the  fact that I 
slam my fingers in a door, jump up and down, scream and behave in an 
appropriate way mean i actuallyFEEL the pain?  Is the pain I feel 
like the pain you feel?  I don't mean quantitively, but qualitively.  
I.e. you can describe that I feel pain, but could you ever actually 
feel my pain.  This is discussed in:
Nagel, T. (1974) What is it like to be a bat?
Philosophical Review 83: 435 - 451.  Reprinted in:
Hofstadter, D.R. and Dennett, D.C. (1988)  The Mind's I  London : Bantam
Books [Shelved at: BF 311 MIN]
and
 
Nagel, T. (1986) The View From Nowhere.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Sharon [with thanks to Matt for the reference]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Feb 13 2001 - 16:23:38 GMT