Re: Institutional Repositories

From: Jeffery, KG (Keith) <"Jeffery,>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:38:06 -0000

Richard -
one further use of IRs is - usually closely linked with a CRIS (Current
Research Information System) - as a database to provide statistics on
research output (publications,not patents nor products) by institution,
department, group, individual researcher. 
This may be used in exercises such as the RAE in UK. 
In Norway, the FRIDA CRIS (centrally maintained in Oslo but partitioned
by university)  includes basic publication information and is being used
directly to affect the funding to each university based on research
[for anyone interested, more information on CRIS an be found at ]
[by the way, you may wish to ad to your list of IR software the CCLRC
ePubs system ]


Prof Keith G Jeffery          Director InformationTechnology                                                                     
               and Head Business & Information Technology Department              CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
T:+44 1235 44 6103        Chilton, Didcot, OXON  OX11  0QX UK
F:+44 1235 44 5831
WWW Person:
ERCIM President & CCLRC Director:
W3C Office at CLRC-RAL             
President euroCRIS          
VLDB Trustee Emeritus:          
EDBT Board Member               

The contents of this email are sent in confidence for the use of the
intended recipient only.  If you are not one of the intended recipients
do not take action on it or show it to anyone else, but return this email
to the sender and delete your copy of it

The CCLRC telecommunications systems may be monitored in accordance with
the policy available from


From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
Behalf Of Richard Poynder
Sent: 23 December 2005 10:13
Subject: Institutional Repositories



Hi All,


I am aware that the concept of "the institutional repository" (IR) tends
to mean different things to different people, so I would be interested in
hearing people's views on the topic.


Amongst the different roles I have heard people argue that IRs can/should
play are:


 a) as a repository for a university's research output, with the aim of
increasing access to that research, and so enhancing its impact


 b) as a tool for preserving and curating a university's research output


c) as a tool to assist a university in its digital publishing ambitions,


d) as a tool to enable universities offer digital courseware and online
learning services.


Would others agree that IRs are viewed as potentially assisting in all
these tasks?


Are there other tasks people see being assigned to IRs?


Can an IR play a number of different roles simultaneously, or should it
be restricted to just one (possibly two) roles? What are the pros and
cons of using an IR to play more than one role?


Also, what solutions are people choosing when setting up IRs? I am aware
that there are now a number of software and service providers (both for
profit and non-profit), including Eprints, DSpace, Fedora, ProQuest and
BMC. But what are people's views on the roles these different providers
can/should play? Are they playing them well?


Finally, I am also curious as to the current state of play in the major
universities (Stanford, Yale, University of California, MIT, CalTech,
Harvard, Oxford, Cambridge etc. etc.). I assume they all now have IRs up
and running, but what sort of IRs are they creating, what solutions are
they choosing when creating them, what roles are being assigned to these
IRs, and how are these universities going about populating them with the
institution's research output?



Richard Poynder

Freelance Journalist

Received on Tue Jan 03 2006 - 13:12:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:48:10 GMT