Re: UK's HEFCE Squandering Its Credibility and Assets In Research Assessment

From: Stevan Harnad <amsciforum_at_GMAIL.COM>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:27:30 -0500

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 3:01 PM, <C.Oppenheim_at_lboro.ac.uk> wrote:

      the deal for the evaluation for the REF Pilot was ALWAYS
      only to use Web of Knwledge as the database


That is bad enough news in itself. REF should be test piloting a rich
battery of multiple references, from multiple sources, not just one
minimal proprietary subset.†

Stevan Harnad

------

      Having worked for Thomson companies in the past I can
      confirm that Thomson leaves them very much to their own
      devices and makes no effort to get them to follow a party
      line. †In any case, all Evidence is doing is an analysis
      of the REF Pilot, not the main REF itself. †contracts for
      running the main REF have not yet been signed. †What's
      more the deal for the evaluation for the REF Pilot was
      ALWAYS only to use Web of Knwledge as the database,
      whereas all the indications for the full REF are that it
      will use both Web of Science and Scopus. So I think
      Stevan can sleep easy on this one.

      Charles

      On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:02:21 -0500
      †Stevan Harnad <amsciforum_at_GMAIL.COM> wrote:
            *Re:
            Corbyn, ZoŽ (2009) "Conflict of interest
            warning over Evidence
            sale<http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=405093>"
            [to Thompson Reuters]. Times Higher Education
            Supplement. 22 January 2009*

            There is indeed not only a potential but an
            actual conflict of interest when
            the party that is comparing and assessing the
            different candidate data and
            databases that can be used in UK national
            research assessment is the
            commercial producer of one of the candidate
            databases.
            HEFCE is sleep-walking in letting this
            happen, and in several other
            decisions it is making without thinking them
            through properly, including the
            failure to test and validate a rich variety
            of other potential
            research-assessment metrics, over and above
            the few that either
            Reuters-Thompson ISI or its (now
            disadvantaged) rival SCOPUS can offer,
            especially the ones provided by the growing
            worldwide network of Open Access
            Repositories.

            HEFCE is well on the way to foolishly locking
            itself into dependence on only
            what is available from a single commercial
            provider -- under the guise of an
            objective assessment by an independent honest
            broker.

            *Stevan Harnad
            <http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/>*
            American Scientist Open Access
Forum<http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-F
            orum.html>

            Harnad, S. (2001) Research access, impact and
            assessment<http://cogprints.org/1683/>
            . *Times Higher Education Supplement* 1487:
            p. 16.

            Brody, T., Kampa, S., Harnad, S., Carr, L.
            and Hitchcock, S. (2003)
            Digitometric
            Services for Open Archives
            Environments<http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/7503/>.
            In *Proceedings of European Conference on
            Digital Libraries*, Trondheim,
            Norway.

            Harnad, S., Carr, L., Brody, T. & Oppenheim,
            C. (2003) Mandated online RAE
            CVs Linked to University Eprint Archives:
            Improving the UK Research
            Assessment Exercise whilst making it cheaper
            and
            easier<http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue35/harnad/>
            . *Ariadne* 35.

            Harnad, S. (2006) Online, Continuous,
            Metrics-Based Research
            Assessment<http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/12130/>
            . *Technical Report, ECS, University of
            Southampton*.

            Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Oppenheim, C.,
            McDonald, J. W., Champion, T. and
            Harnad, S. (2006) Extending journal-based
            research impact assessment to
            book-based disciplines
            <http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/12725/>.*Technical
            Report, ECS, University of Southampton*.

            Harnad, S. (2007) Open Access Scientometrics
            and the UK Research Assessment
            Exercise
            <http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/13804/>. In
            *Proceedings of 11th
            Annual Meeting of the International Society
            for Scientometrics and
            Informetrics* 11(1), pp. 27-33, Madrid,
            Spain. Torres-Salinas, D. and Moed,
            H. F., Eds.

            Brody, T., Carr, L., Harnad, S. and Swan, A.
            (2007) Time to Convert to
            Metrics
            <http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14329/>.*Research
            Fortnight* 17-18.

            Brody, T., Carr, L., Gingras, Y., Hajjem, C.,
            Harnad, S. and Swan, A.
            (2007)Incentivizing
            the Open Access Research Web:
            Publication-Archiving, Data-Archiving and
            Scientometrics
            <http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14418/>.
            *CTWatch Quarterly*
            3(3).

            Harnad, S. (2008) Self-Archiving, Metrics and
Mandates<http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/members/secureDocument.cfm?doc
            ID=1916>
            . *Science Editor* 31(2) 57-59

            Harnad, S. (2008) Validating Research
            Performance Metrics Against Peer
            Rankings
            <http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/15619/>.*Ethics
            in Science and
            Environmental Politics* 8 (11)
            doi:10.3354/esep00088 (Special issue: *The
            Use And Misuse Of Bibliometric Indices In
            Evaluating Scholarly Performance*)

            Harnad, S., Carr, L. and Gingras, Y. (2008)
            Maximizing Research Progress
            Through Open Access Mandates and
            Metrics<http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/16617/>
            . *Liinc em Revista* 4(2).
Received on Sun Feb 15 2009 - 21:06:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:49:42 GMT