We have been discussing Les Carr's message further within the SHERPA Core
Team and concluded that he has a valid point. Consequently, we will be
changing our recommendations in the OpenDOAR Policy Tool for the
harvesting of full items by robots. These policy options will remain, BUT
they will no longer be either minimal or optimal OpenDOAR-recommended
options.
We expect to releaser the amended the Policy Tool by the end of the week.
Regards
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
/> st1\:* { BEHAVIOR: url(#ieooui) } _at_page Section1 {size: 595.3pt
841.9pt; margin: 72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; mso-header-margin: 35.4pt;
mso-footer-margin: 35.4pt; mso-paper-source: 0; } P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman";
mso-style-parent: ""; mso-pagination: widow-orphan;
mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman" } LI.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE:
12pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman";
mso-style-parent: ""; mso-pagination: widow-orphan;
mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman" } DIV.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE:
12pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman";
mso-style-parent: ""; mso-pagination: widow-orphan;
mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman" } P { FONT-SIZE: 12pt;
FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New
Roman" } DIV.Section1 { page: Section1 }
Peter Millington
SHERPA Technical Development Officer
Greenfield Medical Library, <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />University of Nottingham,
Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England
Phone: +44 (0)115 84 68481
________________________________________________________________________________
From: Leslie Carr [mailto:lac_at_ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: 12 June 2007 16:26
To: American Scientist Open Access Forum
Cc: Millington Peter
Subject: Re: Get the Institutional Repository Managers Out of the
Decision Loop
Peter Murray-Rust [PM-R] replied:
"Stevan Harnad... has been consistent in
arguing the logic [of what comes with the
OA territory]... and I agree with the
logic... [but]... several repository
managers at the JISC meeting [said] I could
not have permission to do [such things]
with their current content. I asked 'can my
robots download and mine the content in
your current open access repository of
theses?' - No. 'Can you let me have some
chemistry theses from your open access
collection so I can data-mine them?' - No -
you will have to ask the permission of each
author individually.
The OpenDOAR repository policies tool tends to act towards
over-cautiousness in the policies that they suggest for data and
document reuse.
The current policies that they produce have options to explicitly
allow services that do full text indexing and citation analysis,
BUT THAT IS ALL.
By enumerating the potential allowable services they are
effectively stifling innovation and research, and that is a BAD
thing. The last thing that OA advocates ought to do is build up
ANOTHER rights-withholding infrastructure.
I do hope that this a a short-sighted transition phenomenon, but it
should certainly be addressed now (and strongly).
--
Les Carr
Received on Thu Jun 14 2007 - 12:16:45 BST