Collaboration: is it inherently dangerous? A singer’s perspective Event

This paper asks the question, if collaboration is not inherently dangerous, why does it feel like it might be?

Though post #metoo, discussions around ‘consent’ and ‘safety’ in classical music have slowly increased, in practice, hierarchical power structures in singing training and the opera industry combined with onstage sexual and physical violence against women continue to lead to well-documented abuse, and a culture of disempowerment for women. Singers sit at the intersection of classical music and theatre, combining the obedience and unattainable perfectionism of classical training with physically and psychologically embodying a role onstage. Vulnerability onstage is highly prized for female and upper voice singers in both opera and new music, where they embody a wide range of intense emotions and violence including abuse, murder, grief and explicit sex scenes. However, displaying real, human vulnerability offstage is often received as ‘being difficult’ or unprofessional. In an industry where the jobs are already limited, and currently declining, the fear of not being rehired is high, making it very difficult to give meaningful consent, or be ‘safe’ at work.

Drawing on my own experiences in both opera and new music collaborations, this paper will consider the separation of our onstage and off-stage personas, and the physical and psychological risks taken by experimental vocal performers who were trained for the opera industry. I will explore how this impacts the power dynamics in new music collaboration, and consider pathways to a safer working environment for composers and performers.

For further information, please contact Matthew Shlomowitz: m.shlomowitz@southampton.ac.uk.