Skip to main navigationSkip to main content
The University of Southampton

PAIR2017 European Security Governance

Module Overview

It is the first time in history that we can approach the problem of European security architecture in terms of governance, rather than hegemony or the balance of power. The proliferation of European and global institutions concerned with addressing different dimensions of broadly defined security is encouraging and an indication of progress in light of the extremely violent first half of the 20th century. At the same time, however, some of Europe’s centuries-old demons seem to have returned with vengeance (conflict with Russia) and new challenges undermine the established security order (Brexit). At the centre of these progressive and regressive developments is the EU and the ever-important problem of the nature and scope of European integration. In the field of international security, the EU has made an important, if often overlooked progress, transforming the very approach to long-term security challenges. At the same time, the security dimension of European integration is very much work in progress and, in light of the aforementioned challenges, raises some fundamental questions.

Aims and Objectives

Learning Outcomes

Knowledge and Understanding

Having successfully completed this module, you will be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of:

  • Identify key theoretical debates and institutional aspects of European security governance, as well as key problems on the contemporary European security agenda.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of the current structures of European security governance based on how well they are suited for addressing contemporary security problems.
Subject Specific Intellectual and Research Skills

Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:

  • Explain the contemporary and historical empirical dynamics of European security governance and relate them to theoretical debates.
Transferable and Generic Skills

Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:

  • Apply the knowledge of institutions involved in European security governance to devise strategies for addressing contemporary security problems.


The module may cover the following sample topics, depending on developments in European security in a given year: International Relations Theory and European Security European Security Governance Peace through European Integration The Evolution of Security Theories The EU and International Security: CFSP/CSDP The EU and International Security: European Commission NATO and Transatlantic Relations The United Nations System of Security Russia, the West and Conflict in Ukraine Terrorism and Counter-terrorism Proliferation of WMDs Climate Security

Learning and Teaching

Teaching and learning methods

The module will be delivered through a combination of traditional and innovative methods, including: (a) Lectures (1 hour per week): allowing students to receive an in-depth introduction for each week’s topic. (b) Blended Learning Sessions (1 hour per week): allowing students to instantly practice the newly acquired knowledge through problem-based learning activities. (c) Student-led Tutorials (2 hours fortnightly): led by students, who must open up the discussion with a presentation on assigned reading, followed by the debate involving all students. (d) On-line Assessment Preparation (1 hour per week): facilitated through an on-line collaboration platform Microsoft Teams.

Guided independent study12
Blended Learning24
Independent Study102
Total study time150

Resources & Reading list

Wilkinson, Rorden (2005). The Global Governance Reader. 

Kurowska, Xymena (2011). Explaining the EU's common security and defence policy. 

Schroeder, Ursula C (2011). The Organization of European Security: internal and external security in transition. 

Zwolski, K. (2011). ‘The External Dimension of the EU’s Non-proliferation Policy: Overcoming Inter-institutional Competition’, European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 16. 

Kirchner, Emil J. and Dominiguez, Roberto (2011). The Security Governance of International Organizations. 

Kaunert, C. and Zwolski, K. (2013). The European Union as a Global Security Actor: A Comprehensive Analysis beyond CFSP and JHA.. 

Zwolski, K. (2012). ‘The EU as an International Security Actor after Lisbon: Finally a Green Light for a Holistic Approach?’, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 47. 

Hoffmann, Matthew J. and Alice D. Ba (2005). Contending Perspectives on Global Governance: coherence, contestation and world order. 

Ginsberg, Roy H (2012). The European Union in global security; The politics of impact. 

Zwolski, K. (2012). ‘The EU and a Holistic Security Approach after Lisbon: Competing Norms and the Power of the Dominant Discourse’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 19. 

Toje, Asle (2010). The European union as a small power. 

Kirchner, Emil J. and James Sperling (2007). Global Security Governance. 

Krahmann, Elke (2003). ‘Conceptualizing Security Governance’, Cooperation and Conflict. 

Kavalski, Emilian (2008). Extending the European Security Community; constructing peace in the Balkans. 

Zwolski, K. & Kaunert, C. (2011). The EU and Climate Security: A Case of Successful Norm Entrepreneurship?' European Security Vol 20. 

Gänzle S. and Sens, A. (2007). The Changing Politics of European Security: Europe Alone?. 

Zwolski, K. (2011).  ‘Unrecognised and Unwelcome? The Role of the EU in Preventing the Proliferation of CBRN Weapons, Materials and Knowledge’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, vol. 12. 

Daase, Christopher and Cornelius Friesendorf (2010). Rethinking Security Governance: the Problem of Unintended Consequences. 

Wagnsson, Charlotte, James A. Sperling and Jan Hallenberg (2009). uropean Security Governance: the European Union in a Westphalian world. 

Webber, Mark, Stuart Croft, Jolyon Howorth, Terry Terriff and Elke Krahmann (2004). The Governance of European Security’, Review of International Studies. 



MethodPercentage contribution
Essay  (1500 words) 45%
Policy Brief Report  (1500 words) 45%
Presentation  (800 words) 10%


MethodPercentage contribution
Essay  (1500 words) 50%
Policy Brief Report  (1500 words) 50%


MethodPercentage contribution
Essay  (3000 words) 100%

Repeat Information

Repeat type: Internal & External

Share this module Share this on Facebook Share this on Twitter Share this on Weibo
Privacy Settings