Module overview
Aims and Objectives
Learning Outcomes
Learning Outcomes
Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:
- Demonstrate knowledge of, and competence in applying the principles, purposes and different types of assessment undertaken with people with common mental health disorders
- Demonstrate knowledge of, and competence in ‘patient-centred’ information gathering to arrive at a succinct and collaborative definition of the person’s main mental health difficulties and the impact this has on their daily living.
- Demonstrate knowledge of, and competence in selecting an appropriate mode of delivery in partnership with patients. If digital modes of delivery are considered, competence to assess a service user's suitability for online interventions, revising this as necessary on an ongoing basis.
- Demonstrate competence in identifying patients at assessment who do not fit the criteria for treatment at Step 2 (e.g. those with PTSD, social anxiety disorder or severe mental health problems) and facilitate appropriate stepping up or onward referral.
- Demonstrate knowledge of, and competence in recognising patterns of symptoms consistent with diagnostic categories of mental disorders (according to ICD 11) from a patient- centred interview, and by doing so correctly identify the correct primary problem descriptor.
- Demonstrate knowledge of, and competence in the use of standardised assessment tools including symptom and other psychometric instruments to aid problem recognition and definition and subsequent decision making.
- Demonstrate knowledge of, and competence in giving evidence-based information about treatment choices and in making shared decisions with patients.
- Demonstrate competence in understanding the service user's attitude to a range of mental health treatments including prescribed medication and evidence-based psychological treatments.
- Demonstrate knowledge of, and competence in using ‘common factors’ to engage patients, gather information, build a therapeutic alliance with people with common mental health problems, manage the emotional content of sessions and grasp the client’s perspective or “world view”.
- Demonstrate understanding of the complexity of mental disorders and competence in conceptualising comorbidity, including how to decide the primary target problem for intervention in the context of comorbidity of mental and physical health problems.
- Demonstrate competence in assessing and understanding the world view of patients, with a focus on the here and now, including cognitive patterns and biases that link to specific conditions and the implications of these to shape low-intensity working.
- Demonstrate knowledge, understanding and critical awareness of concepts of mental health and mental illness, diagnostic category systems in mental health and a range of social, medical and psychological explanatory models.
- Demonstrate knowledge of, and competence in accurate risk assessment with patients or others to ensure practitioners can confidently manage this effectively in accordance with NICE Guidance.
- Demonstrate the ability to set agreed goals for treatment which are specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and timely (SMART).
- Demonstrate competence in clinical decision making in terms of choosing the appropriate pathway for a service user after assessment.
- Demonstrate knowledge, understanding and competence in using the COM-B behaviour change model to identify intervention goals and choice of appropriate interventions.
Syllabus
Learning and Teaching
Teaching and learning methods
| Type | Hours |
|---|---|
| Lecture | 50 |
| Preparation for scheduled sessions | 10 |
| Wider reading or practice | 100 |
| Supervised time in studio/workshop | 30 |
| Tutorial | 10 |
| Total study time | 200 |
Resources & Reading list
Journal Articles
A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, pp. 1092-1097.
Pullen, I. & Loudon, J. (2006). Improving standards in clinical record-keeping. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 12, pp. 280–286.
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. & Williams, J. (2001). The PHQ–9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, pp. 606–613.
Mead, N. & Bower, P. (2000). Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical litterature. Social Science and Medicine, 51, pp. 1087-1110.
Mead, N. & Bower, P (2002). Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 48, pp. 51-61.
Textbooks
BMA & RPS (2008). British National Formulary.. London: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain..
American Psychiatric Association (1994). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) IV. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Depression in Adults (update). Depression: the treatment and management of depression in adults. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
Bazire, S. (2003). Psychotropic drug directory 2003/2004: the professionals’ pocket handbook and aide memoire. Salisbury: Fivepin Publishing.
Williams, C (2003). Overcoming anxiety: a five areas approach. London: Arnold.
Westbrook, D., Kennerley, H. & Kirk, J (2007). An introduction to cognitive behaviour therapy: skills and applications. Michigan: Sage.
Raistrick, H. & Richards, D. (2006). Designing primary care mental health services. Hyde: Care Services Improvement Partnership.
Newell, R. & Gournay, K (2000). Mental health nursing: an evidence-based approach. Oxford: Elsevier Health Services.
Layard, R. (2006). The depression report. London: London School of Economics.
Myles, P. & Rushforth, D (2007). A complete guide to primary care mental health. London: Robinson.
Department of Health (1999). National service framework for mental health: modern standards and service models.. London: Department of Health.
Care Services Improvement Partnership (2006). Primary care services for depression – a guide to best practice, appendix 4: asking about risk. Hyde: Care Services Improvement Partnership.
Williams, C.J. (2006). Overcoming Depression and low mood: A Five Areas Approach. London: Hodder Arnold.
Kennerley, H. (1997). Overcoming anxiety.. London: Constable Robinson.
Goldberg, D. & Huxley, P., (1992). Common mental disorders: a biosocial model. London: Routledge.
Egan, G., (2001). The skilled helper: a systematic approach to effective helping. California: Brooks / Cole.
Lovell, K. & Richards, D. (2008). A recovery programme for depression. London: Rethink.
Heron, J (2000). Helping the client: a creative practical guide. London: Sage.
Bennett-Levy, J., Richards, D.A. & Farrand, P., et al., eds (2010). The Oxford Guide to Low Intensity CBT Interventions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gray, P. & Mellor-Clark, J. (eds.) (2007). CORE: A Decade of Development. Rugby: CORE IMS.
Pilgrim, D. & Rogers, A. (2005). Sociology of mental health. Maidenhead: Maidenhead.
Appleby, L (2004). The national service framework for mental health – five years on. London: Department of Health Publications.
World Health Organization (1992). ICD-10 Classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Silverman, J., Kurtz, S. & Draper, J. (2005). Skills for communicating with patients. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2009). Generalised anxiety disorder and panic disorder (with or without agoraphobia) in adults Management in primary, secondary and community care. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
Department of Health (2000). The NHS Plan: A plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: Department of Health.
Assessment
Assessment strategy
Method of repeat year: 2x failure of assessment 1 leads to immediate withdraw from programme as specified in national curriculum.Formative
This is how we’ll give you feedback as you are learning. It is not a formal test or exam.
Triage assessment
- Assessment Type: Formative
- Feedback: Written feedback from course tutors.
- Final Assessment: No
- Group Work: No
Summative
This is how we’ll formally assess what you have learned in this module.
| Method | Percentage contribution |
|---|---|
| Reflective essay | 100% |
Referral
This is how we’ll assess you if you don’t meet the criteria to pass this module.
| Method | Percentage contribution |
|---|---|
| Reflective essay | 100% |
Repeat Information
Repeat type: Internal & External