Module overview
Aims and Objectives
Learning Outcomes
Subject Specific Intellectual and Research Skills
Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:
- Translate finance problems into appropriate AI tasks, selecting suitable tool types (e.g., LLM, AI agents, rules‑based, RPA, analytics) and designing effective prompting strategies.
- Analyse operational processes to identify automation opportunities and determine where RPA, human review and AI‑assisted judgement should sit in the workflow.
- Create lightweight prototypes and workflow automation designs for realistic financial‑services processes, incorporating appropriate testing, exception handling and controls.
- Evaluate AI solutions using practitioner‑relevant criteria including accuracy, controls, auditability, bias and operational resilience.
- Produce practitioner‑oriented deliverables (e.g., prompt packs, operating procedures, control checklists, business cases) that support auditable and operationally usable AI‑enabled workflows.
Transferable and Generic Skills
Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:
- Work effectively in diverse teams to analyse FinTech cases, develop strategic recommendations and present findings.
- Exercise critical judgement in interpreting AI‑generated content in finance contexts, including checking logic, calculations and alignment with regulatory and ethical expectations.
- Collaborate productively with AI‑enabled tools, including specifying tasks clearly, iterating based on outputs and documenting AI assistance.
- Communicate complex FinTech, data and AI concepts clearly in written and oral form to non‑specialist audiences.
- Reflect on your own learning and evolving career trajectories in FinTech and AI‑enabled finance
Knowledge and Understanding
Having successfully completed this module, you will be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of:
- Explain core AI/ML concepts relevant to financial services (supervised vs unsupervised learning, classification/ranking, forecasting, NLP, generative models and AI agents) at a level sufficient to assess suitability for business problems.
- Summarise key FinTech contexts used in the module (cryptocurrencies, DeFi, open banking/embedded finance, platforms/ecosystems, RegTech/SupTech) and explain how data and APIs enable AI‑supported workflows.
- Describe how AI‑enabled tools are used across financial‑services roles (front office, operations, risk, compliance, product, audit), and distinguish between model‑building, tool use, agentic workflows and process automation.
- Summarise practical governance expectations for AI use in finance confidentiality, documentation, validation, operational resilience and accountability—focusing on implementation in day‑to‑day work.
Syllabus
Learning and Teaching
Teaching and learning methods
| Type | Hours |
|---|---|
| Independent Study | 126 |
| Teaching | 24 |
| Total study time | 150 |
Resources & Reading list
Textbooks
Harvey, C., Ramachandran, A. and Santoro, J (2021). DeFi and the Future of Finance. Wiley.
Ghose, R (2024). Future Money: FinTech, AI and Web3. Kogan Page.
Mollick, E. (2024). Co Intelligence: Living and Working with AI. Portfolio/Penguin.
Atomium-EISMD (2020). A14people’s 7 AI Global Frameworks (Banking & Finance; Insurance)..
Assessment
Assessment strategy
Assessment is 100% coursework and is designed to emphasise applied, critical engagement with AI‑enabled workflows in finance—prompting, automation design and responsible use—rather than unreflective use of AI. 1. Individual Reflective Report (100% of module mark; final assessment): • This element of the assessment consists of a single reflective report entitled “My Financial Technology Journey”, which is a 2,000 word (± 10%) in which you will reflect on your personal development though this module. The writing should cite and be supported by relevant concepts, models, theories and reference literature. The report should include the short learning log reflections that you should have maintained throughout the module, which capture your reflections each week and document your development over time. • Marking will focus on: depth of reflection and self-awareness; theories and concepts from the module; Integration of learning log insights; clarity, structure and academic writing quality; and appropriate use of academic references. 2. Group AI & Automation Implementation Challenge (formative; does not contribute to final mark): • Group project (3–5 students): a written group report plus a 10–15 minute in‑class demo/presentation and Q&A. • Groups choose a finance operations/product/compliance process and design a feasible AI + automation solution, including a process map, RPA/automation design, prompt pack elements, exception handling, controls/audit trail, and a short business case (benefits, risks, implementation plan). • Formative assessment of realism, integration of course concepts, quality of controls and governance, teamwork, and effectiveness of the demo/presentation. Use of AI tools in assessments must be explicitly documented and critically reviewed (e.g., prompt register, what was checked and how); over‑reliance on unchecked AI‑generated content is penalised. Feedback is provided through written comments on coursework and oral feedback on project demos, with feed‑forward into professional development.Formative
This is how we’ll give you feedback as you are learning. It is not a formal test or exam.
Group report and presentation
- Assessment Type: Formative
- Feedback: Oral and written formative feedback on group report and demo/presentation.
- Final Assessment:
- Group Work: No
Summative
This is how we’ll formally assess what you have learned in this module.
| Method | Percentage contribution |
|---|---|
| Individual report | 100% |
Referral
This is how we’ll assess you if you don’t meet the criteria to pass this module.
| Method | Percentage contribution |
|---|---|
| Individual report | 100% |
Repeat
An internal repeat is where you take all of your modules again, including any you passed. An external repeat is where you only re-take the modules you failed.
| Method | Percentage contribution |
|---|---|
| Individual report | 100% |
Repeat Information
Repeat type: Internal & External