Skip to main navigationSkip to main content
The University of Southampton
Courses

PAIR3006 Global Justice: Theories & Debates

Module Overview

This module provides an introduction to recent debates within international political theory on the issue of global justice. It addresses questions such as: What obligations do individuals have to those affected by poverty or ecological degradation on the global scale? From where do these obligations derive? How should these obligations be balanced with any obligations to fellow nationals? What would global justice look like? How demanding is it, and how might we achieve it?

Aims and Objectives

Module Aims

Having successfully completed this module, you will be able to: - Have a critical understanding of a range of theoretical positions on global justice. - Be in a position to evaluate differing claims about obligations to fellow nationals and towards humanity as a whole. - Have a good level of understanding of a series of contemporary normative debates relating to, for instance, international trade, climate change, migration and human rights.

Learning Outcomes

Learning Outcomes

Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:

  • Have a critical understanding of a range of theoretical positions on global justice.
  • Be in a position to evaluate differing claims about obligations to fellow nationals and towards humanity as a whole.
  • Have a good level of understanding of a series of contemporary normative debates relating to, for instance, international trade, climate change, migration and human rights.

Syllabus

The module begins by examining cosmopolitan and nationalist or communitarian positions on global distributive justice, and goes on to consider a series of contemporary debates on issues such as: - Global poverty. Who, in anyone, has a responsibility to attempt to alleviate it? On what basis? - The moral significance of borders. Do we have additional or special obligations to members of our own national communities? If so, why? And how do these relate to wider obligations to humanity? - Global warming / ecological degradation. What, if anything, can contemporary theories of justice contribute towards an account of the justice of the environment? - Resource ownership. Should theorists of justice treat current patterns of ownership of the world’s resources as a given, or should they suggest alternatives? What might these be?

Learning and Teaching

Teaching and learning methods

Coursework

TypeHours
Independent Study150
Total study time150

Resources & Reading list

Bell, Duncan (2010). Ethics and World Politics. 

Armstrong, Chris (2012). Global Distributive Justice. 

Brooks, Thom (ed) (2008). The Global Justice Reader. 

Assessment

Summative

MethodPercentage contribution
Essay  (3000 words) 60%
Essay  (2000 words) 40%

Referral

MethodPercentage contribution
Coursework assignment(s) 100%
Share this module Share this on Facebook Share this on Twitter Share this on Weibo

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×